Legislation requiring large construction projects to formally set out how they will deal with waste is to be repealed despite half of the responses to a Defra consultation being against the proposalsRelated articles
- Defra announces deregulation plans
- Overhaul of green regulation not revolutionary
- Red tape review to alter 70% of regulation
The environment department has confirmed that from 1 December the Site Waste Management Plans Regulations (2008) will be scrapped in line with the government’s drive to cut “red tape”.
Under the Regulations, construction or demolition projects worth £300,000 or more must complete a site waste management plan (SWMP) detailing how waste will be managed at all stages of the project. The aim was to encourage firms to minimise waste and boost levels of reuse, reclamation and recycling.
The announcement of the repeal came in the government’s formal response to a consultation that closed on 18 July. The 169 consultation responses were equally split for and against the repeal of the Regulations – 49% each, with 2% of responses “neutral”.
Of the 70 contractors that responded, 41 were in favour of the scrapping of the legislation, while 29 were against. Meanwhile, more private businesses from the construction sector, developers and local authorities were against scrapping the rules than were in favour of them being repealed.
According to Defra’s calculations, repealing the legislation will save the construction sector a total of £3.9 million a year. However, the impact assessment calculation was based on the administrative savings from not completing a plan, and more than two-thirds of respondents to the consultation confirmed that they would continue to use SWMPs even if they were no longer mandatory.
In light of such feedback, Defra’s concludes that scrapping the Regulations will have a minimal impact on the construction sector’s efforts to cut waste.
“Repealing the Regulations will provide a cost saving to business, while giving the option of retaining SWMP as a tool that can be applied to any project to help identify savings,” states its consultation response.
Defra’s proposal to scrap the Regulations was first announced in March 2012, following the completion of the government’s red tape challenge review of environmental regulation.
The department stated that the legislation was “ineffective”, but critics of the move, including the UK Environmental Law Association, argued that Defra should consider how enforcement could be improved rather than repealing the Regulations.
- Login to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Author: Sarah-Jayne Russell
Date:10 September 2013
Categories:
- Supply chain
- Reporting
- Waste
- Regulation and caselaw
- Management
- Procurement
- Local government
- Defra
- EMS
- Minimisation
- News
- Construction
- Recycling
- Disposal
IEMA News
- Spotlight on the new chair of the board
- Policy update: Balancing competence
- Consultation ends on Vision 2020
- Countdown for 2013 graduate award
Latest Consultations
- Triennial review of the MMO
- Aarhus Convention implementation
- Welsh SEA on water
- Biodiversity offsets
New Regulations
- Gas & Petroleum (Consents) Charges Regs 2013
- EU Directive 2013/28/EU – lead solders
- EU Directive 2013/27/EU – chlorfenapyr
- Water Resources (Scot) Act 2013 (No.1) Order 2013
News
- Transport firms working in France must report carbon
- Mandatory GHG reporting comes into force
- Warming is ‘unequivocal’ confirms IPCC
- Renewables jobs up 74% as economy flatlines
Features
- Sustainability report selection tool
Kye Gbangbola looks at the latest guidance from the GRI on sustainability reporting and its focus on materiality - Life support systems
Society must embrace natural infrastructure rather than rely solely on technical solutions, argues Mark Everard - Dammed success in tackling water scarcity
Kadenge Kamadi reports on how one Kenyan village is tackling water scarcity by building dams that use technology first employed by the Romans in 400BC - Financing savings
A lack of capital can prevent firms installing energy efficiency equipment, but there is money available. Paul Suff takes a look at some of the funding options - The appliance of science
The University of Cambridge is harnessing brainpower to find new ways of cutting its carbon footprint. Becky Allen reports - Constructing national EIAs
Steve Pearce on the differences between assessing big infrastructure projects and standard developments
Leave a Reply