Climate change can be defined as the change in the temperature of the earth’s surface usually because of burning fossil fuels. Burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
While the internet is a good source of knowledge, there is a lot of contradicting information on whether or not climate change is real. Every time policies are presented to help avert climate change, there are some voices which emerge, arguing that climate change is non-existent.
Most people who don’t believe in climate change argue that there is no proof to support it. We will mention three reasons why climate change is real. These reasons will enable you to understand climate change, how real it is, and how scientists can track it.
Climate Change Is Measurable Using New Technology
Those who don’t believe in climate change argue that temperature measurement ceases the last 15 years. The argument is based on the old technique of measuring temperature.
Using new technology, we can measure the temperature of the earth’s surface and the core. In the last 15 years, the temperature of the planet has been rising, similar to how the temperature would rise when four bombs are detonated.
We Understand The Cause Of Climate Change Better
Due to the advancement in science, we have a better understanding of what brings about climate change than before. Instead of focusing on measurable ends, we are now in a position to accurately identify the ratio of the contributing sources.
The recent list of causes shows that power plants cause 44% of the warming, while transportation causes 33.3%. Farming is the next leading factor among other sources.
A Significant Percentage (97%) Have A Consensus On The Existence Of Climate Change
There are quite a number of people who are not in agreement with the scientists who have already signed a consensus about the state of climate change and global warming.
The group is purported to be a political group, which is false. It is a scientific organization for climate science specialists. Those who disagree with the findings presented by these organizations are scientists with minimal experience or with limited education in climate studies.